About Me

Name: Harvey
Email: harvey2338@bellsouth.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama's One Great Gift Is A Two-edged Sword

When I was in my early 20s, a older man I worked with told me something I've always remembered, because what he told me is so true.  I've observed his wisdom to be never-failing.
 
He said, "Harvey, if you'll learn to speak well, people will always give you credit for being smarter than you really are."
 
How many times have you seen this demonstrated?  People with good ideas who can't express them clearly come across as ineffective, if not competent, while people with bad ideas who express their ideas clearly and passionately--even ideas without merit--attract people to their side and are perceived to be extremely intelligent.
 
Great speaking ability, however, is a two-edged sword.  It is a dangerous thing for people who don't think for themselves.  These unfortunate souls are soft puddy in the hands of a gifted speaker.  A person with excellent speaking ability can make an unsuspecting audience fall for any screwball idea, because they present their case with such clarity, such passion, such believability.  A person with lousy ideas, even dangerous ideas, can easily mislead people.
 
Barack Hussein Obama is such a person.  When aided by a TelePrompter, Obama can charm white off rice.  He is a gifted speaker and communicator when he has time to prepare, or when somebody writes a good speech for him.  But his ideas don't stand up under close scrutiny.  That's why he comes across as a stumbling, fumbling fool when he has to speak off-the-cuff. 
 
That's when his true beliefs are exposed.  That's why he often expresses conflicting beliefs and ideas.  Obama tailors his prepared remarks to fit his audience.  But when he is forced to speak without his TelePrompter, he says what he really thinks.  Worse still, if he hasn't thought it out, he wings it, and makes it up as he goes along.  That's why he answers a simple yes-or-no question with paragraphs of pure babble.  He then can't remember what he really believes, because he doesn't have the time to know what his audience believes.
 
So if you're really concerned about what Obama believes, not what he says, examine his high-sounding rhetoric.  What he promises isn't what he can deliver.  His ideas are either unworkable, too expensive to be practical, or simply unacceptable in a free country like The United States of America.
 
Our government cannot solve all the world's ills.  It can't solve all our country's problems either.  And it cannot solve problems for an individual who has the personal obligation to solve his own problems.  As Thomas Jefferson observed, a government strong enough to give you everything you want, is also strong enough to take everything you have.
 
American's need to remember this great truth on election day.  Our freedom may depend on it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Consistency Matters

Many years ago a man whom I admired gave me some valuable advice about leadership.  I had just been appointed to a divisional sales management position and this man 's division was one of the company's national leaders.
 
He said, "The thing people want most from their leader is consistency.  If you're a jerk, they may not like it, but they can adjust to it.  If you're a nice guy, they'll like it and they'll grow to expect it.  However, if you're a nice guy in one situation and a jerk in another, they'll be confused and get discouraged.  Eventually, they'll quit because they don't know what direction you're taking."
 
This is as true now as it was then.  It is especially true for the leader of the free world, the President of The United States of America.
 
Senator Obama is the epitome of inconsistency.  I'd never vote for his liberal philosophy anyway, but were he to become President, I could adjust if I just knew what he believes.
 
The most recent example of his inconsistency is his position on accepting campaign contributions from lobbyists.  He has made a big deal about not accepting campaign contributions from lobbyists. 
 
Then today I read this in Robert Novak's column:

The Republican lobbyist who was solicited for contributions by Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign a month ago has received a second request for money from the Democratic presidential candidate, who has banned lobbyist money from supporting his candidacy. The second try was made after no response to the first attempt. As did the first solicitation, the second letter signed by Obama asked the veteran Republican donor and fundraiser for a contribution "to change the way business is done in Washington."

The lobbyist's only contributions to Democrats have been to two powerful committee chairmen -- John Dingell (Energy and Commerce) and Charlie Rangel (Ways and Means) -- in order to open their doors to his clients. The lobbyist figures that the Obama campaign lifted his name from Dingell and/or Rangel money lists.

What does Obama believe and when?  Does he want campaign contributions from lobbyists?  It's apparent that he does.  He just doesn't want voters to know it.
 
This kind of leader is dangerous.  Mainly because even he doesn't know what direction he will take. 
 
The problem with a leader like that is his lack of resolve.  He'll never stay the course . . . any course.  Because he'll abandon his beliefs of today for other beliefs tomorrow, if it's personally or polictically expedient.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »