About Me

Name: Harvey
Email: harvey2338@bellsouth.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Experience versus Longevity

Experience, or the lack of it, has become the big issue in this presidential election. 
Barack Obama has less than four years in the Senate; Joe Biden has 36 years in the Senate. 
 
John McCain has more than 22 years in the Senate; Sarah Palin has two years as a governor.
 
The question is this:  When is 36 years of experience really 36 years of experience?  It is when a person has done something new or different in every one of those 36 years.  If a person does the same thing in the same way year after year, that person doesn't have 36 years of experience.  That person simply has one year of experience repeated 36 times.
 
So, can a person who has been a small-town mayor, a state oil and gas conservation commissioner, and a governor, all in a span of a dozen or less years be more experienced than a person who has been a Senator for 36 years?  It's possible.  Look at the range of experiences crammed in those few years.
 
It's apparent to me that Sarah Palin is a fast learner.  She's not afraid to do something new and different.  She's willing to take on the establishement, even though she's new on the job.  My point is that barring John McCain's dropping dead in his first year or two as president, there is virtually no risk in having Sarah Palin as vice president.
 
On the other hand, should Barack Obama become presdent and die prematurely, we would be stuck with Joe Biden.  What new could he possibly bring to the oval office?  I can't see that he's done anything new and different in decades.
 
Think about it.  One can have many years of experience, of a few years of experience.  But . . . is it experience or longevity?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's One Great Gift Is A Two-edged Sword

When I was in my early 20s, a older man I worked with told me something I've always remembered, because what he told me is so true.  I've observed his wisdom to be never-failing.
 
He said, "Harvey, if you'll learn to speak well, people will always give you credit for being smarter than you really are."
 
How many times have you seen this demonstrated?  People with good ideas who can't express them clearly come across as ineffective, if not competent, while people with bad ideas who express their ideas clearly and passionately--even ideas without merit--attract people to their side and are perceived to be extremely intelligent.
 
Great speaking ability, however, is a two-edged sword.  It is a dangerous thing for people who don't think for themselves.  These unfortunate souls are soft puddy in the hands of a gifted speaker.  A person with excellent speaking ability can make an unsuspecting audience fall for any screwball idea, because they present their case with such clarity, such passion, such believability.  A person with lousy ideas, even dangerous ideas, can easily mislead people.
 
Barack Hussein Obama is such a person.  When aided by a TelePrompter, Obama can charm white off rice.  He is a gifted speaker and communicator when he has time to prepare, or when somebody writes a good speech for him.  But his ideas don't stand up under close scrutiny.  That's why he comes across as a stumbling, fumbling fool when he has to speak off-the-cuff. 
 
That's when his true beliefs are exposed.  That's why he often expresses conflicting beliefs and ideas.  Obama tailors his prepared remarks to fit his audience.  But when he is forced to speak without his TelePrompter, he says what he really thinks.  Worse still, if he hasn't thought it out, he wings it, and makes it up as he goes along.  That's why he answers a simple yes-or-no question with paragraphs of pure babble.  He then can't remember what he really believes, because he doesn't have the time to know what his audience believes.
 
So if you're really concerned about what Obama believes, not what he says, examine his high-sounding rhetoric.  What he promises isn't what he can deliver.  His ideas are either unworkable, too expensive to be practical, or simply unacceptable in a free country like The United States of America.
 
Our government cannot solve all the world's ills.  It can't solve all our country's problems either.  And it cannot solve problems for an individual who has the personal obligation to solve his own problems.  As Thomas Jefferson observed, a government strong enough to give you everything you want, is also strong enough to take everything you have.
 
American's need to remember this great truth on election day.  Our freedom may depend on it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Baracuda Scares Obamaniacs To Death

 Obama's campaign is on the run.  They're spending more time talking about McCain-Palin than they are talking about Obama-Biden.  They're in panic mode.  Obama is a man in an empty suit who can't express a lucid thought without his TelePrompter.  McCain is exposing him for what he is--an articulate mental lightweight, a rookie playing in the big leagues.  Biden . . . well, he's just mean-spirited.  Sarah Baracuda will cut him to pieces, leaving voters smiling while he bleeds.

McCain played an ace, picking Palin.  The Dims left 18 million cards face down on the table in Denver.  Palin will pick up a lot of them in November.  Experience beats youth almost every time.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Could Hillary Steal The Nomination At The Convention?

Since Obama isn't stretching his lead in the polls, and is even losing it in some, is it possible that Hillary could refuse to give up her delegates at the convention?  That would be interesting, and in my mind not too far-fetched.  She has been silent since her begrudging concession to Obama, so I won't be surprised to see her cause trouble at the convention.  I'd love nothing better than to see a good old free-for-all, knock-down-and-drag-out floor fight among the Democrats.  The more Obamba talks without a Teleprompter, the more he exposes his ignorance, arrogance, and lack of experience. 
 
And how about Bill's latest public statement that nobody is really qualified to be president, even former vice presidents?  But he does think Hillary is the most qualified for the Presidency to appear in the past 30 years.  Isn't it a bit late for this kind of talk, if he didn't have something sneaky up his sleeve?  The Clintons are definitely sneaky, so remember you heard it here.  They aren't done yet.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Consistency Matters

Many years ago a man whom I admired gave me some valuable advice about leadership.  I had just been appointed to a divisional sales management position and this man 's division was one of the company's national leaders.
 
He said, "The thing people want most from their leader is consistency.  If you're a jerk, they may not like it, but they can adjust to it.  If you're a nice guy, they'll like it and they'll grow to expect it.  However, if you're a nice guy in one situation and a jerk in another, they'll be confused and get discouraged.  Eventually, they'll quit because they don't know what direction you're taking."
 
This is as true now as it was then.  It is especially true for the leader of the free world, the President of The United States of America.
 
Senator Obama is the epitome of inconsistency.  I'd never vote for his liberal philosophy anyway, but were he to become President, I could adjust if I just knew what he believes.
 
The most recent example of his inconsistency is his position on accepting campaign contributions from lobbyists.  He has made a big deal about not accepting campaign contributions from lobbyists. 
 
Then today I read this in Robert Novak's column:

The Republican lobbyist who was solicited for contributions by Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign a month ago has received a second request for money from the Democratic presidential candidate, who has banned lobbyist money from supporting his candidacy. The second try was made after no response to the first attempt. As did the first solicitation, the second letter signed by Obama asked the veteran Republican donor and fundraiser for a contribution "to change the way business is done in Washington."

The lobbyist's only contributions to Democrats have been to two powerful committee chairmen -- John Dingell (Energy and Commerce) and Charlie Rangel (Ways and Means) -- in order to open their doors to his clients. The lobbyist figures that the Obama campaign lifted his name from Dingell and/or Rangel money lists.

What does Obama believe and when?  Does he want campaign contributions from lobbyists?  It's apparent that he does.  He just doesn't want voters to know it.
 
This kind of leader is dangerous.  Mainly because even he doesn't know what direction he will take. 
 
The problem with a leader like that is his lack of resolve.  He'll never stay the course . . . any course.  Because he'll abandon his beliefs of today for other beliefs tomorrow, if it's personally or polictically expedient.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »